'Vibe coding' named word of the year by Collins Dictionary

TL;DR

  • Collins Dictionary has named "vibe coding" as its word of the year for 2023.
  • The term refers to the practice of developing applications by conveying ideas to artificial intelligence (AI) through prompts.
  • "Vibe coding" reflects growing trends in AI usage in software development.
  • The term is part of a wider shift toward intuitive programming methods.

'Vibe Coding' Named Word of the Year by Collins Dictionary

In an era where technology continues to intertwine with creativity, "vibe coding" has emerged as a standout term, being recognized as the word of the year for 2023 by Collins Dictionary. This innovative concept is gaining traction in the tech community, marking a notable shift in how software applications are developed and understood.

The term "vibe coding" specifically refers to the art of creating applications by simply describing them to artificial intelligence (AI). This process allows developers and non-developers alike to communicate ideas and concepts to AI systems, which can then generate code or improve existing applications based on those descriptions. This development exemplifies a growing trend towards more intuitive forms of programming, where technical knowledge is not a prerequisite for development.

The Rise of Intuitive Programming

The recognition of "vibe coding" highlights the increasing accessibility of technology. As AI tools like ChatGPT and other machine learning models evolve, they enable a broader demographic to engage in coding without extensive training. This shift speaks volumes about the democratization of tech, opening doors for creators who may have previously felt excluded from the world of programming.

  • Key Features of 'Vibe Coding':
  • Simplifies the coding process by allowing users to describe their ideas orally or in writing.
  • Utilizes AI to interpret these descriptions and generate code.
  • Encourages collaboration between creative thinkers and technical implementers, fostering innovation.

The term was one of the ten new entries on Collins Dictionary's shortlist, suggesting a remarkable growth in its use and importance within technological discussions. As the digital landscape evolves, the relevance of such terminology becomes crucial for understanding the new frontiers of development practices.

Impact and Future Implications

The recognition of "vibe coding" underscores a significant transformation in the tech landscape. By incorporating AI, individuals can turn their visions into reality more efficiently. This transition raises questions about the future of software development, including:

  • Will traditional coding languages become obsolete?
  • How will education systems adapt to this change?
  • What implications does this have for the job market in tech fields?

As AI continues to streamline and enhance programming capabilities, developers must consider how best to integrate these innovative approaches into their workflows. The future of "vibe coding" may pave the way for new methods of creativity and productivity, reshaping both how applications are built and who can create them.

Conclusion

In naming "vibe coding" its word of the year for 2023, Collins Dictionary highlights the exciting potential of using AI to revolutionize app development. By making coding accessible to a wider audience, this trend could lead to remarkable innovations in technology, emphasizing creativity and intuition over technical skill alone. As we stand on the brink of this new era in programming, it will be fascinating to observe how both developers and users adapt to this dynamic shift.

References

[^1]: "Collins Dictionary Announces 'Vibe Coding' as Word of the Year." Collins Dictionary. Retrieved October 29, 2023.

Metadata

Keywords: vibe coding, word of the year, Collins Dictionary, AI, app development, intuitive programming, technology trends, software development

'Vibe coding' named word of the year by Collins Dictionary
System Admin November 6, 2025
Share this post
Tags
Who’s right about AI: economists or technologists?