TL;DR: I suspect the market for courses teaching n8n (workflow automation) is about to collapse. I recently tested Claude 4.5 Opus on complex workflow generation, and the results were terrifyingly good. It didn't just replicate my work; it refactored it. A complex SEO workflow that took me sleepless nights to build manually (40 nodes) was rebuilt, optimized, and condensed into 28 nodes by Claude in seconds. This isn't just assistance; it's replacement.
James here, CEO of Mercury Technology Solutions.
If you are currently selling a course on "How to Master n8n," I have bad news: You might be out of a job soon.
I stumbled upon this realization today while experimenting with Claude 4.5 Opus. I initially wanted to test the n8n MCP (Model Context Protocol) to see if I could connect it to Claude for automatic workflow generation.
I hit a roadblock immediately: the official n8n MCP doesn't support creating nodes automatically yet.
But, since I was already there, I decided to try a brute-force approach. I took my existing, production-grade SEO article generation workflow—a beast of a system I use daily—and reverse-engineered it into a prompt. Then, I asked Claude to rewrite the entire n8n JSON schema from scratch.
I wanted to see if it would break. In my experience, Gemini usually chokes and hallucinates once a workflow exceeds 15 nodes.
The result was absurd.
Claude didn't just complete the task. It humiliated my original engineering.
- Complete Generation: It generated a fully functional, import-ready workflow JSON.
- Logic Upgrade: It didn't just copy my logic; it improved it. It found redundancies I hadn't noticed.
- Code Optimization: It rewrote the JavaScript inside the Code Nodes to be cleaner and more efficient.
- Efficiency: It took my original 40-node monster and refactored it down to a sleek, 28-node machine. It runs faster and consumes fewer execution credits.
I sat there looking at the screen, thinking about the sleepless nights I spent debugging that original 40-node flow, painstakingly connecting node by node, testing variables, and fixing syntax errors.
What was all that effort for? Was I just proving I could "eat bitterness" (suffer)?
We are entering a phase where "Click-Ops"—the manual act of dragging and dropping nodes in a GUI—is becoming obsolete. The value is no longer in knowing how to connect the nodes. The value is in defining what the workflow should achieve.
The Architect (you) defines the intent. The AI (Claude) handles the implementation. If you are still teaching people how to drag-and-drop, you are teaching a skill that just became a commodity.
Mercury Technology Solutions: Accelerate Digitality.
